| An explanatory note:
What follows are the contents of
an email sent by Prof. Tim White (Berkeley, Hearst Museum) on July 12,
1999 prior to his departure for Ethiopia, and subsequently circulated by
others. He has requested that we forward this information to
interested colleagues. The email begins below and continues with
the NAGPRA Review Committee Draft Agreement and
concludes with his letter to the committee.
As you will read below,
comments on the NAGPRA Review Committee Draft
Agreement
must be received you by September 3, 1999 (an extension has been granted).
Email comments will not be accepted.
However, if you wish to have
your comments published on this web site, please send your letter in the
body of an email to webmaster@kellywebworks.com.
More letters
Jeffrey
H. Schwartz
Clark
Spencer Larsen
on behalf of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists
In addition, a
petition to extend the comment period will be mailed from this site
on August ??. If you wish to endorse this petition please go here.
(This action is pending given notification of an extension.)
Sincerely,
Kevin M. Kelly
Webmaster, BioAnth.org |
|
Dear colleagues,
Apologies for the bulk e-mail
nature of this. Under the circumstances it seemed the most efficient
method of contact.
As most of you know, the 1990
Native American Graves Repatriation and Protection Act mandates that
human skeletal remains culturally AFFILIATED to federally recognized
groups are eligible for repatriation. In that law, Congress left it to a
NAGPRA committee of seven individuals to promulgate regulations
regarding culturally UNIDENTIFIABLE remains. As you also know, many of
the nation's prehistoric human remains are culturally unidentifiable. If
you're on the mailing list, you know the value of these remains.
The NAGPRA committee has finally
drafted language in this regard. As you will see from the embedded
draft, and my embedded letter of response, the committee has chosen to
go far beyond both Congressional intent and the letter of the law. It is
very important that concerned skeletal biologists take the opportunity
to immediately and forcefully comment on these proposals.
Unfortunately, time is short. We
must address our comments to:
The NAGPRA Review Committee
c/o Departmental Consulting Archeologist
National Park Service (2275)
1849 C St. NW. (NC340)
Washington DC, 20240
Please note that they DO NOT
ACCEPT e-mail comments, only hard copy.
Please also note the deadline of
AUGUST 15th, 1999. You can draw your own conclusions about these
restrictions.
I urge each of you to write to
the committee. It is very important that as many individual and
institutional voices as possible be raised regarding this issue. You may
find copies of the proposed draft (that are easier to read than what
I've embedded here) at the following www addresses:
http://www.cast.uark.edu/other/nps/nagpra/nagpra.dat/rcrec003.pdf
http://www.cast.uark.edu/other/nps/nagpra/nagpra.dat/rcrec003.html
For texts of the
laws and regulations themselves,
http://www.cast.uark.edu/other/nps/nagpra/nagpra.html
I leave this week for Ethiopia,
but my letter below is in the mail, and I hope yours will be soon.
Please don't hesitate to forward this communication to the attention of
other researchers and institutions that might be able to write
appropriate letters.
Thanks in advance to you all,
and apologies for the length and impersonal nature of this alert. No
need to reply to this e-mail--I can't answer until August anyway. If you
don't care about the potential destruction of the country's prehistoric
skeletal research collections, I'm sorry to have bothered you with this
message. Have a good summer.
Cordially,
Tim White
Draft
Agreement ~ Tim White's Letter ~ Petition
for Extension ~ Home
|